K_L4otS4U/hqdefault.jpg' alt='How To Install Joomla 2.5 On Windows Server 2008' title='How To Install Joomla 2.5 On Windows Server 2008' />Word. Press vs Joomla Review. Revised on 1. 5 November 2. This is not a pro contra review. In this article I try to give you some pointers to make it easy to chose between the two popular content management systems. XKbHXpYqE/hqdefault.jpg' alt='How To Install Joomla 2.5 On Windows Server 2008' title='How To Install Joomla 2.5 On Windows Server 2008' />La Autoescuela de los Famosos, la Autoescuela de Cuenca La Autoescuela San Cristbal. El 95 de los alumnos aprueban el Terico en 4 das. Prctico fcil. The FastCGI module in IIS enables popular application frameworks that support the FastCGI protocol to be hosted on the IIS Web server in a high performance and. The basic difference between Word. Press and Joomla is that Joomla is a portal or community type site while Word. Press is a blog.   Both overlap each other in several areas and can be extended beyond their original purpose thanks to the use of plugins. You can find those plugins almost everywhere on the internet. Both have a large user base with a lively community where tips and tricks are shared. Both are free to use and many hosting providers have them as an option in their web tools section. Both have a large community of volunteer developers and commercial add ons. This topic is somewhat outside the scope of Miracle Tutorials, but the reason I thought it was important to publish is that it relates to the setup of video portals and which CMS to chose, so, here it is To Joomla or not to Joomla. If you want to create a community or a network with a membership area, newsroom, forums, articles, input from external authors etc then Joomla is a good choice because it is made to be that way. Creating a navigation structure is easy, once you understand how it works and it doesnt require knowledge of html. You can set articles to expire after a time, activate dates, author name, breadcrumbs etc. Thus, Joomla gives you a lot of power in your hands and that is noticeable in the admin section where there are so many options that you get dizzy the first time you go in. You really should get a good book on Joomla if you want to set it up fast. Otherwise you end up fiddling around and getting nowhere for days. You can find a whole range of books on this subject with Packt Publishing. Adapting the look is simple if you are happy with changing some colors and the logo. Beyond that, you will find that Joomla has a complicated structure and even seasoned web developers have to go through a learning curve before they master the layout system, and that approach is different depending on the layout template you chose. Joomla has multi lingual capability built in. This works very well but it is not that simple. You have to follow a certain order over actions to make it work, but it is very powerful. Luckily, there are many video tutorials available on You. Tube. Just type joomla multilingual in the search box and you will find what you need. UpdateStar is compatible with Windows platforms. UpdateStar has been tested to meet all of the technical requirements to be compatible with Windows 10, 8. Windows 8. Kilauea Mount Etna Mount Yasur Mount Nyiragongo and Nyamuragira Piton de la Fournaise Erta Ale. If you do not want to get involved in the gritty work of stylesheets, you can buy professional layout templates for a reasonable price between 3. Joomla. Shack, for instance. Or you could ask a developer to do it for you, but make sure they have references of Joomla sites or you might end up paying their learning curve and that is what you want to avoid. Disadvantages of Joomla. Importing articles from one site to another is not as easy as with Word. Press. There are extensions for it, like J2. XMLwhich does a good job, but migrating from one major version to the next can be problematic with respect to third party extensions. See also below. Joomla brings out new major upgrades on a regular basis. These upgrades break a lot of extensions and migrating from older versions is not an easy task, especially when you have a complex setup with membership system, forum etc This is something the Joomla community really needs to address because moving to the latest version can be time consuming. Joomla promissed that it will make it easier from version 3,4 onwards. Hopefully this is true, because it is the major reason why some people migrate to Word. Press. Simple updates between upgrades are easy to do with a click on a button, they seldom break anything. In short Joomlas strenght is in complexity. Deep level navigation, sections in sections, categories etc Unlike, Word. Press, it makes no distinction between posts and pages, instead you use articles and modules for your content. Modules are best used for small pieces of content and media. Great for all sorts of sites, with preference for community sites, e. Commerce and portfoliopresentation sites. To Word. Press or not to Word. Press. Word. Press is basically a very user friendly blog system but it can be used as a regular site which you can update without any knowledge of html the same goes for Joomla. You can create pages and posts, and with plugins, you can add a lot of functionality included standard in Joomla. Because Word. Press is a blog system, Google seems to love it although recently, Google decides no longer to count links from rss directories, which was the major advantage of Word. Press over Joomla. The interface is easy to understand, you wont need a book for it, although buying a Word. Press for Dummies book will save you some time if you have no experience with blog management at all. Adapting the look requires some knowledge of CSS, the style sheet language. Like with Joomla, if you select a templatetheme close to what you want, adapting the colors, logo etc. CSS, and you would like to re arrange navigation elements as well, you might consider hiring a web developer. Since Word. Press has a logical structure, it is easy for a developer to change things around, place ad banners etcAgain, give preference to a specialized developer used to work with Word. Press. It is setup very quickly and you can be listed in Google within 2 days. I havent seen any other system doing that so far. Network Footprinting Reconnaissance The tester would attempt to gather as much information as possible about the selected network. Reconnaissance can take two forms. XAMPP z m p or k s. Apache Friends, consisting. For Joomla, it takes about 7 days, although you can push it by using SEO tools. A regular html site can take up to a month to get listed in Google, so this is something to take into account. Anybody can learn enough in 2 hours to create content with Word. Press right away, including using categories and sub pages. Word. Press has no multi lingual capability but this can be managed with a plugin like Polylang, which is quite easy to use. Major upgrades of Word. Press are not as frequent as Joomla and they seldom require extra work. None of my plugins have broken between 3. Importing posts and pages from other WP sites is easy. There is built in importer. JPG' alt='How To Install Joomla 2.5 On Windows Server 2008' title='How To Install Joomla 2.5 On Windows Server 2008' />Disadvantages of Word. Press For instance, adding or removing post dates, need to be changed in design mode and it requires knowledge of WP scripting. The navigational structure is determined by the layout template you chose. Changing that structure again requires knowledge of the WP scripting language and CSS. With Joomla, you do not run into this problem because menus are controlled via the control panel and attributes like dates, author name etc, can be turned on and off per article or for the whole site in one go. In that sense, Joomla is much more a content management system. Also, changing the order of categories or pages is rather cumbersome in Word. After reading the image hosting thread and reading the Web Host threadforumreplies. FREE web hostsWould. Press.  But you can use a plugin like Post Types Order to change the order op posts. Driver Download For Hp Printer on this page. Widgets can help compensate for the lack of a strong menu system like Joomla, but it helps and it is quick to setup with the drag and drop feature. In short Word. Press is simple, you can see it as a blog or as a regular website. It has fixed pages, posts and categories. Through the use of plugins you can extend its functionality and let it grow as big and complicated as you want. However, not every plugin is easy to understand, so it might be a good idea to have a specialized web developer in case of emergencies. Security measures for both platforms. XAMPP Wikipedia. Not to be confused with XMPP, a messaging protocol or WAMP, a Windows web server equivalent. XAMPPA screenshot of XAMPP running all servers on Mac OS XDevelopersApache Friends. Initial release. May 2. Stable release. 7. Windows. 7. 1. 1. OS November 1. 0, 2. Repositoryhttps github. Apache. Friends. Development status. Active. Written in. Various Languages. Operating system. Cross platform. Linux. Windows. Solarismac. OSPlatform. Windows 2. Vista, 7, 8, 1. 0 x. Bit. Linux Debian, Red. Hat, Cent. OS, Ubuntu, Fedora, Gentoo, Arch, SUSE x. Bitmac. OS 1. 0. Bit. Size. Windows x. Bit 1. Mb. Linux x. Bit 1. Mbmac. OS x. 64 Bit 1. Mb. Available in. Type. WAMP, MAMP, SAMP, LAMPLicense. GNU General Public Licence. Alexa rank 1. 0,5. Websiteapachefriends. XAMPP or 2 is a free and open sourcecross platformweb serversolution stack package developed by Apache Friends,2 consisting mainly of the Apache HTTP Server, Maria. DBdatabase, and interpreters for scripts written in the PHP and Perlprogramming languages. XAMPP stands for Cross Platform X, Apache A, Maria. DB M, PHP P and Perl P. It is a simple, lightweight Apache distribution that makes it extremely easy for developers to create a local web server for testing and deployment purposes. Everything needed to set up a web server server application Apache, database Maria. DB, and scripting language PHP is included in an extractable file. XAMPP is also cross platform, which means it works equally well on Linux, Mac and Windows. Since most actual web server deployments use the same components as XAMPP, it makes transitioning from a local test server to a live server extremely easy as well. EtymologyeditThe term XAMPP is an apparent acronym. However, there is no official acronym expansion specified on the Apache Friends website. Their homepage header reads XAMPP Apache Maria. DB PHP Perl, indicating that this abbreviation is a recursive acronym. The term can be unofficially broken down as follows My. SQL was replaced with Maria. DB on 2. 01. 5 1. XAMPP versions 5. While both letters P are de facto interchangeable, convention used at the Apache Friends website indicates that the first letter P is short for PHP and the latter letter P is short for Perl. PrerequisiteseditXAMPP requires only one zip, tar, 7z, or exe file to be downloaded and run, and little or no configuration of the various components that make up the web server is required. FeatureseditXAMPP is regularly updated to the latest releases of Apache, Maria. DB, PHP and Perl. It also comes with a number of other modules including Open. SSL, php. My. Admin, Media. Wiki, Joomla, Word. Press and more. 9 Self contained, multiple instances of XAMPP can exist on a single computer, and any given instance can be copied from one computer to another. XAMPP is offered in both a full and a standard version Smaller version. Officially, XAMPPs designers intended it for use only as a development tool, to allow website designers and programmers to test their work on their own computers without any access to the Internet. To make this as easy as possible, many important security features are disabled by default. XAMPP has the ability to serve web pages on the World Wide Web. A special tool is provided to password protect the most important parts of the package. XAMPP also provides support for creating and manipulating databases in Maria. DB and SQLite among others. Once XAMPP is installed, it is possible to treat a localhost like a remote host by connecting using an FTP client. Using a program like File. Zilla has many advantages when installing a content management system CMS like Joomla or Word. Press. It is also possible to connect to localhost via FTP with an HTML editor. ComponentseditXAMPP 7. Windows and Linux, Mac OSX, including 1. Component. On Windows. On Linux. On mac. OSApache 2. 4. 2. Yes. Yes. Yes. Maria. DB 1. 0. 1. 2. 8Yes. Yes. Yes. PHPYes 7. Yes 7. 1. 1. 11. Yes 7. My. Admin. Yes 4. Yes 4. 7. 4. Yes 4. Open. SSLYes 1. Yes 1. Yes 1. XAMPP Control Panel 3. Yes. No. No. Webalizer. Yes 2. 2. 3 0. Yes 2. Yes 2. 2. 3 0. Mercury Mail. Yes. No. No. Transport System 4. Yes. No. No. Tomcat 7. Yes. No. No. Strawberry Perl 7. Portable. Yes. No. No. File. Zilla FTP Server 0. Yes. No. No. Pro. FTPD 1. 3. 4c. No. Yes. Yes. GD 2. 0. No. Yes. Yes. Perl 5. No. Yes. Yes. Freetype. No. Yes. Yeslibpng 1. No. Yes. Yesgdbm 1. No. Yes. Yeszlib 1. No. Yes. Yesexpat 2. No. Yes. Yes. Sablotron 1. No. Yes. Yeslibxml 2. No. Yes. Yes. Ming 0. No. Yes. Yespdf class 0. No. Yes. Yesncurses 5. No. Yes. Yesmodperl 2. No. Yes. Yes. Free. TDS 0. 9. 1No. Yes. Yesgettext 0. 1. 8. No. Yes. Yes. IMAP C Client 2. No. Yes. Yes. Open. LDAP client 2. 4. No. Yes. Yesmcrypt 2. Yes. Yes. Yesmhash 0. No. Yes. Yesc. Url 7. No. Yes. Yeslibxslt 1. No. Yes. Yeslibapreq 2. No. Yes. Yes. FPDF 1. No. Yes. Yes. ICU4. C Library 4. 8. 1. No. Yes. Yes. APR 1. No. Yes. Yes. APR utils 1. No. Yes. Yes. Major Component Versions in XAMPP ReleaseseditXAMPPApache. Maria. DBMy. SQLPHPRef. See alsoeditReferenceseditExternal linksedit.